difficulties
In principle this part should not exist.
I do not have the right to claim knowing for sure how we should proceed, neither does anybody.
We will either hear all our specialists and decide together, or not at all.
The ideas in this chapter are only personal, punctual suggestions, one opinion among many, which may serve no purpose at all because I am sure that others and our collective will come up with better ones, but I include it in the book in case it might eventually serve a tiny purpose.
Currently, mankind is divided in all ways possible, made to doubt and mistrust himself, doubt his capacity to correct any wrong that he is subjected to, but the worst is that humanity has lost his vision and drive for great human and social endeavors and projects. Maybe the word "lost" is inexact, and we should say that man's grand vision and drive are made to be temporarily eclipsed by the current overwhelming necessity to survive.
Humanity has shrunk to being a shadow that works, consumes, smiles thinking he is eternal, and dies weeping.
Man did this to himself, not God...
Everything about the endeavor is new and grand, and if we dare imagine its scale ... our heads would spin.
We also have to meet and deal with all facets of human irrationality, indoctrination, and habitudes installed throughout the centuries or decades at best.
All we can do is flash the facts of existence and the capacities of the human mind in all human minds, and trust human common sense and intelligence to treat these facts, restructure ideas, "certitudes" and priorities, and eventually do what's rational, which also means what's right in the higher, global human perspective.
The entire endeavor being intimidating does not mean that each step in the process of its creation and implementation is intimidating.
For example, the first step might simply be a yes or a no to a simple question of the sort:
"Do you personally have one or more of the following dislikes and preferences (desires) ?:
Dislike for death and sickness, and a preference to live longest in excellent health (survival),
Dislike of scarcity, and a preference for abundance (physical well-being),
Dislike of frustration and sadness, and a preference for satisfaction and happiness (emotional well-being)?"
There may be more dislikes and preferences, but the issue is not to find "all" human dislikes or desires.
If yes, then we have consensus, and the second step maybe initiating a discussion if a planetary commitment to science can make us have our common desires in a reasonable time frame, hopefully "very soon"..., and of course contact scientists, to have their opinions.
If we see that our crushing majority, including the scientists, walk on the positive side of the answer, then the capacity of the planetary scientific project to offer us our needs and desires "very soon", will become official.
Once the capacity of science to deliver ("very soon"...) what we need and desire becomes official, then the third step may be informing the world of the fact that man is now in measure to conquer himself all his "dislikes" that have made his life miserable from day one (supposing there is a day one), and satisfy by himself all his basic desires that until now were only promised by some of our religions, and that peace and even "paradise on earth" may well be within reach... for every human; his dreams can now be realized.
If the world wants to realize its dreams, then the horizontal discussions about the best first step to bring the project on line may begin.
All options or solutions should be decided by our collective, because our collective contains ALL the specialists of the planet, and in every domain.
There is no alternative to our togetherness.
I do not have the right to claim knowing for sure how we should proceed, neither does anybody.
We will either hear all our specialists and decide together, or not at all.
The ideas in this chapter are only personal, punctual suggestions, one opinion among many, which may serve no purpose at all because I am sure that others and our collective will come up with better ones, but I include it in the book in case it might eventually serve a tiny purpose.
Currently, mankind is divided in all ways possible, made to doubt and mistrust himself, doubt his capacity to correct any wrong that he is subjected to, but the worst is that humanity has lost his vision and drive for great human and social endeavors and projects. Maybe the word "lost" is inexact, and we should say that man's grand vision and drive are made to be temporarily eclipsed by the current overwhelming necessity to survive.
Humanity has shrunk to being a shadow that works, consumes, smiles thinking he is eternal, and dies weeping.
Man did this to himself, not God...
Everything about the endeavor is new and grand, and if we dare imagine its scale ... our heads would spin.
We also have to meet and deal with all facets of human irrationality, indoctrination, and habitudes installed throughout the centuries or decades at best.
All we can do is flash the facts of existence and the capacities of the human mind in all human minds, and trust human common sense and intelligence to treat these facts, restructure ideas, "certitudes" and priorities, and eventually do what's rational, which also means what's right in the higher, global human perspective.
The entire endeavor being intimidating does not mean that each step in the process of its creation and implementation is intimidating.
For example, the first step might simply be a yes or a no to a simple question of the sort:
"Do you personally have one or more of the following dislikes and preferences (desires) ?:
Dislike for death and sickness, and a preference to live longest in excellent health (survival),
Dislike of scarcity, and a preference for abundance (physical well-being),
Dislike of frustration and sadness, and a preference for satisfaction and happiness (emotional well-being)?"
There may be more dislikes and preferences, but the issue is not to find "all" human dislikes or desires.
If yes, then we have consensus, and the second step maybe initiating a discussion if a planetary commitment to science can make us have our common desires in a reasonable time frame, hopefully "very soon"..., and of course contact scientists, to have their opinions.
If we see that our crushing majority, including the scientists, walk on the positive side of the answer, then the capacity of the planetary scientific project to offer us our needs and desires "very soon", will become official.
Once the capacity of science to deliver ("very soon"...) what we need and desire becomes official, then the third step may be informing the world of the fact that man is now in measure to conquer himself all his "dislikes" that have made his life miserable from day one (supposing there is a day one), and satisfy by himself all his basic desires that until now were only promised by some of our religions, and that peace and even "paradise on earth" may well be within reach... for every human; his dreams can now be realized.
If the world wants to realize its dreams, then the horizontal discussions about the best first step to bring the project on line may begin.
All options or solutions should be decided by our collective, because our collective contains ALL the specialists of the planet, and in every domain.
There is no alternative to our togetherness.