groups of pressure
Groups of pressure (lobbies) that target the hired executive units by bypassing the system of vote, even bypassing the information system altogether, can never exist in a republic.
Forcing the executive unit to give way to a lobby's own interests without keeping the owner informed and at the owner's expense is downright treason.
Forcing the executive is treason, and the executive giving in to these groups is treason.
Even communicating with lobbies should be illegal.
If there is a group that has interests to pass, it should address the legislative unit to fix laws for them, and then address the executive in all transparence. This way pressure will no longer be necessary, and the name "pressure groups" will exist no more.
Once we think about the interests of groups of pressure, we will understand their desire for secrecy.
If the interests of the lobbies and the public were symbiotic, there would be neither pressure nor secrecy.
Pressure implies the use of some kind of illegal force that illegally obliges the executive unit to illegally comply and execute an illegal action which defeats democracy.
But the executive not only admits the presence of lobbies, but further admits giving in to their pressure, even if the public realizes that the use of force to have privileges is what democracy was created to prevent...
Forcing the executive unit to give way to a lobby's own interests without keeping the owner informed and at the owner's expense is downright treason.
Forcing the executive is treason, and the executive giving in to these groups is treason.
Even communicating with lobbies should be illegal.
If there is a group that has interests to pass, it should address the legislative unit to fix laws for them, and then address the executive in all transparence. This way pressure will no longer be necessary, and the name "pressure groups" will exist no more.
Once we think about the interests of groups of pressure, we will understand their desire for secrecy.
If the interests of the lobbies and the public were symbiotic, there would be neither pressure nor secrecy.
Pressure implies the use of some kind of illegal force that illegally obliges the executive unit to illegally comply and execute an illegal action which defeats democracy.
But the executive not only admits the presence of lobbies, but further admits giving in to their pressure, even if the public realizes that the use of force to have privileges is what democracy was created to prevent...