The need to understand characteristics
Can a jury condemn an individual or a collective by hearing only the accusation?
Even if it is the Supreme Being who is made to accuse, judge and exterminate our fellow men for being "bad" in a world of scarcity... of His making..., shouldn't we hear their point of view to know their intentions or reasons for their "bad" actions? Shouldn't we at least be presented with clear examples of what they did?
How can we know what intention or action to avoid?
We are being asked by the Genesis-Exodus to validate the Genesis-Exodus and subscribe both collectively and individually to the repeated exterminations of men...
We are doing it because we are claimed by the Genesis-Exodus to be "His people", or because we want to be "blessed" or be saved to paradise or whatever.
Is it too much to expect a single word coming from them or in their defense?
The exterminated are denied defense.
What kind of men have we become to go along with that?
I know it was eons ago, but in our current awareness, to accept the principle of a sentence of genocide, without a defense...
Should we abandon our current awareness?
But before accepting or going along with anything, we should have a clear accusation. "Unrighteousnesss", "wickedness", "righteousness" or "just-ness" should be clearly defined.
All these characteristics are ultimately the products of living in scarcity.
Clear definitions for these qualities are paramount, because they seem to be the central issue for the Genesis-Exodus-presented LORD God of Abraham of Isaac and of Jacob, His main reason for creation, and the reason behind ALL His interventions be they to save, to choose, to curse, to incinerate, to utterly humidify or whatever ways He wants to treat His supposed creation.
Without defining the things by which the accused are accused of, no accusation is possible.
Nevertheless, in the Genesis-Exodus, the undefined accusations are made unilaterally, defense is denied to the accused, the accused are exterminated...
We are expected to be "righteous", and caution such actions, as a non-negatiable condition to be "His people", be "blessed" or be "saved" to paradise or whatever.
Cautioning the repeated exterminations of our fellow humans without a defense may be inconceivable for us, but for the Genesis-Exodus that has a hereditary outlook to life, it must hardly be an issue, since the exterminated have no "generations" to speak for them or care about what happened to them...
Why are we making a fuss?
Naturally Bronze Age "revelations" could not consider that our non-chosen environment and its conditions are our only consciousness and the only medium in which our non-chosen genetically predisposed traits are allowed to develop or be halted, continuously elaborating our outlook and behavior.
Our African forefathers expressed this awareness of environment or conditions of life having a determinant role in our behavior, with the beautiful legend of Kirikou, in which the evil witch is transformed to an angel of goodness by removing a simple thorn from her back. She was evil, because she was in pain. Once the thorn was removed, she became a helpful, kind person.
This wise attitude to behavior is priceless.
If the LORD God of Abraham of Isaac and of Jacob had condemned the evil witch for her bad deeds along with her descendants, then He would have killed all those good people for one good person that had a painful thorn in her back...
The thorn may be looked upon as the crises of scarcity.
All monotheists have taken a package deal:
To be "His people", be "blessed" or be "saved", monotheists have to agree, that the exterminated are responsible for, and deserve their extermination, even if they are exterminated for undefined and supposedly unchangeable characteristics, that furthermore the exterminated never chose to have or lack.
Taking this "package deal" only shows that the return to grace, be it in this world or the next, will only be possible by being egocentric.
The Genesis-Exodus will "educate" decent people into being egoists by making them accept their supposed "superiority" either by being "His people" without the "others", or being individually "blessed" or individually "saved" without the "others".
These descent human beings will find themselves in a sort of "grace" suiting for the self-"righteous", self-centered egoists that they were made to become, thinking it is what they should do for God... It is written after all... It was followed for ages...
Monotheism deprives us of our collaborators, allies and maybe even friends, by "educating" them ("indoctrinating" is exactly the term needed) to be arrogant, selfish, and see us as "lower", "others", rivals...
The monotheists are only helplessly going along with this "education" without being able to think that there is something very wrong: first with this segregation itself, second with this segregation being based on non-defined characteristics which are in fact consequences of scarcity, and third, determinism erasing any accountability of any individual for any "characteristic" or difference, especially for any undefined "characteristic".
But since the Genesis-Exodus presented LORD God of Abraham of Isaac and of Jacob is saying so...
So we have to understand the consequence-characteristic "wickedness" or "unrighteousness" precisely and completely to understand the accusation, because nothing else seems to matter for the monotheism presented God of Abraham of Isaac and of Jacob.
These consequence-characteristics of "righteousness" or "unrighteousness" (reflections of good and bad, themselves consequences of scarcity) define everything; Creation, the purpose of creation, every single action of God, and the reasons for every single action of God, even if these consequence-characteristics are themselves not defined...
The Genesis-Exodus cannot exist without these consequence-characteristics, and these consequence-characteristics cannot exist without their corresponding definitions.
If monotheism is to make any sense, then these characteristics or qualities that define everything in monotheism including its purpose, need to be clearly defined.
Even if it is the Supreme Being who is made to accuse, judge and exterminate our fellow men for being "bad" in a world of scarcity... of His making..., shouldn't we hear their point of view to know their intentions or reasons for their "bad" actions? Shouldn't we at least be presented with clear examples of what they did?
How can we know what intention or action to avoid?
We are being asked by the Genesis-Exodus to validate the Genesis-Exodus and subscribe both collectively and individually to the repeated exterminations of men...
We are doing it because we are claimed by the Genesis-Exodus to be "His people", or because we want to be "blessed" or be saved to paradise or whatever.
Is it too much to expect a single word coming from them or in their defense?
The exterminated are denied defense.
What kind of men have we become to go along with that?
I know it was eons ago, but in our current awareness, to accept the principle of a sentence of genocide, without a defense...
Should we abandon our current awareness?
But before accepting or going along with anything, we should have a clear accusation. "Unrighteousnesss", "wickedness", "righteousness" or "just-ness" should be clearly defined.
All these characteristics are ultimately the products of living in scarcity.
Clear definitions for these qualities are paramount, because they seem to be the central issue for the Genesis-Exodus-presented LORD God of Abraham of Isaac and of Jacob, His main reason for creation, and the reason behind ALL His interventions be they to save, to choose, to curse, to incinerate, to utterly humidify or whatever ways He wants to treat His supposed creation.
Without defining the things by which the accused are accused of, no accusation is possible.
Nevertheless, in the Genesis-Exodus, the undefined accusations are made unilaterally, defense is denied to the accused, the accused are exterminated...
We are expected to be "righteous", and caution such actions, as a non-negatiable condition to be "His people", be "blessed" or be "saved" to paradise or whatever.
Cautioning the repeated exterminations of our fellow humans without a defense may be inconceivable for us, but for the Genesis-Exodus that has a hereditary outlook to life, it must hardly be an issue, since the exterminated have no "generations" to speak for them or care about what happened to them...
Why are we making a fuss?
Naturally Bronze Age "revelations" could not consider that our non-chosen environment and its conditions are our only consciousness and the only medium in which our non-chosen genetically predisposed traits are allowed to develop or be halted, continuously elaborating our outlook and behavior.
Our African forefathers expressed this awareness of environment or conditions of life having a determinant role in our behavior, with the beautiful legend of Kirikou, in which the evil witch is transformed to an angel of goodness by removing a simple thorn from her back. She was evil, because she was in pain. Once the thorn was removed, she became a helpful, kind person.
This wise attitude to behavior is priceless.
If the LORD God of Abraham of Isaac and of Jacob had condemned the evil witch for her bad deeds along with her descendants, then He would have killed all those good people for one good person that had a painful thorn in her back...
The thorn may be looked upon as the crises of scarcity.
All monotheists have taken a package deal:
To be "His people", be "blessed" or be "saved", monotheists have to agree, that the exterminated are responsible for, and deserve their extermination, even if they are exterminated for undefined and supposedly unchangeable characteristics, that furthermore the exterminated never chose to have or lack.
Taking this "package deal" only shows that the return to grace, be it in this world or the next, will only be possible by being egocentric.
The Genesis-Exodus will "educate" decent people into being egoists by making them accept their supposed "superiority" either by being "His people" without the "others", or being individually "blessed" or individually "saved" without the "others".
These descent human beings will find themselves in a sort of "grace" suiting for the self-"righteous", self-centered egoists that they were made to become, thinking it is what they should do for God... It is written after all... It was followed for ages...
Monotheism deprives us of our collaborators, allies and maybe even friends, by "educating" them ("indoctrinating" is exactly the term needed) to be arrogant, selfish, and see us as "lower", "others", rivals...
The monotheists are only helplessly going along with this "education" without being able to think that there is something very wrong: first with this segregation itself, second with this segregation being based on non-defined characteristics which are in fact consequences of scarcity, and third, determinism erasing any accountability of any individual for any "characteristic" or difference, especially for any undefined "characteristic".
But since the Genesis-Exodus presented LORD God of Abraham of Isaac and of Jacob is saying so...
So we have to understand the consequence-characteristic "wickedness" or "unrighteousness" precisely and completely to understand the accusation, because nothing else seems to matter for the monotheism presented God of Abraham of Isaac and of Jacob.
These consequence-characteristics of "righteousness" or "unrighteousness" (reflections of good and bad, themselves consequences of scarcity) define everything; Creation, the purpose of creation, every single action of God, and the reasons for every single action of God, even if these consequence-characteristics are themselves not defined...
The Genesis-Exodus cannot exist without these consequence-characteristics, and these consequence-characteristics cannot exist without their corresponding definitions.
If monotheism is to make any sense, then these characteristics or qualities that define everything in monotheism including its purpose, need to be clearly defined.